Wednesday, June 30, 2021

What are the nutrients and benefits of almond milk?

What are the nutrients and benefits of almond milk?


  1. The almond milk is fashionable as an alternative to cow's milk. But is it really as healthy as some people think? The answer is a resounding yes. From its low sugar levels to its high amount of vitamin E , the benefits of almond milk are ideal for those seeking a healthy and satisfying lifestyle.

What is almond milk?

Almond milk is a drink made from ground almonds and filtered water . Sometimes it also contains additives such as thickeners to extend the best before date and help make its consistency similar to cow's milk.

Is Almond Milk Healthy?

The vegetable milk unsweetened almond , when fortified, can be a healthy food to include in the diet. Because it is significantly lower in calories than cow's milk and other types of plant-based milks, one of the benefits of almond milk is that it allows us to control our calorie intake . However, it contains little or no protein.

drink almond milk

Nutritional information for almond milk

About 200 ml of unsweetened almond milk contains:

  • Calories: 39.
  • Total fat: 2.5 g.
  • Cholesterol: 0 mg.
  • Sodium: 188 mg.
  • Total carbohydrates: 3.4 g.
  • Dietary fiber: 0.5 g.
  • Sugar: 2.1 g.
  • Added sugar: 0 g.
  • Protein: 1 g.

Almond milk macronutrients

  • Total Fat: About 200 ml of unsweetened almond milk contains 2.5 grams of fat , including 0.2 grams of saturated fat, 0.6 grams of polyunsaturated fat, and 1.5 grams of monounsaturated fat. Unsweetened almond milk does not contain cholesterol or trans fat.
  • Carbohydrates: 200 ml of unsweetened almond milk contains 3.4 grams of carbohydrates , 0 grams of fiber and 2.1 grams of natural sugar.
  • Protein: 200 ml of unsweetened almond milk contain has 1 gram of protein .

Vitamins, minerals and other micronutrients

Most almond milk have been fortified with calcium and vitamin D . Still, it's important to check the Nutrition Facts label to be sure. These are the micronutrients that 200 ml of almond milk contains.

  • Vitamin D: 13% of your Daily Value (DV).
  • Vitamin E: 111% DV.
  • Calcium: 37% DV.
  • Potassium (4% DV).
  • Iron (4% DV).
  • Magnesium (4% DV).
  • Zinc (1% DV).

Almond milk benefits

Lower in calories than cow's milk

Among the benefits of almond milk is that it is an excellent option for people who want to consume fewer calories and lose weight . This may come as a surprise, as it is a well-known fact that almonds are high in calories and fat in their raw state. However, the process involved in the production of the almond milk reduces these values ​​significantly.

Good source of calcium

Almonds themselves are not a great source of calcium. However, calcium is usually added to almond milk , as manufacturers know that people use their product as an alternative to daily milk.

In any case, keep in mind that the amount of calcium you can get from almond milk is still less than that found in cow's milk , so it is important to supplement your intake. Fish, seeds, legumes, and green leafy vegetables are some of the options you can consider.

drink almond milk

Suitable for vegans

As a dairy-free plant-based product, almond milk is also a great option for vegans and vegetarians . In fact, it is very useful, since almond milk can be used with cereals, for cooking or making cookies, or even in ice cream. In addition, almond milk does not need to be kept in the fridge , so it is also an incredible alternative for people who like to enjoy days in nature.

High level of vitamin E

Although almonds are a good natural source of vitamin E , some brands enrich your milk even more. As a consequence, just one cup of almond milk can provide between 20 and 50% of the daily amount of vitamin E. This nutrient has antioxidant properties that in turn prevent inflammation and provide many other benefits to the health of your skin .

It is good for people with lactose intolerance

Most adults (about 65%) are lactose intolerant, which means they cannot break down lactose, a type of sugar found in cow's milk. Eating or drinking dairy products with this condition can lead to bloating, abdominal pain, nausea, flatulence, and diarrhea.

For a long time, there were limited options for anyone with lactose intolerance, but with the emergence of plant-based milks, yogurts, and cheeses on the market, there are now many more options. Because almond milk is made from almonds and contains no dairy, it is considered safe for those who are lactose intolerant .

It is low in sugar

Among the benefits of almond milk, it stands out that it is an ideal food to include in a healthy diet . Usually, there are unsweetened almond milks and within those two categories, there are different flavors such as unflavored (regular), vanilla, and in some cases, chocolate. If limiting your intake of sugar and extra calories is important to you, the ideal is to look for unsweetened almond milk .

Note that this benefit refers to unsweetened varieties of almond milk. For comparison, a cup of cow's milk contains 13 grams of carbohydrates , while the same amount of almond milk contains only one or two grams. This means that almond milk has a very low impact on blood sugar levels, which is why this product is recommended for people with diabetes.

Unsweetened almond milk can be very low in calories, averaging 30 calories per 200 ml . This is substantially less than the amount in cow's milk, which can range from about 80 calories in skim milk to 150 calories in whole milk .

Almond milk is also a source of monounsaturated fats , also known as MUFAs, which can help with weight management, along with lowering LDL cholesterol levels.

Tuesday, June 29, 2021

DAIRY PRODUCTS TO BE EXAMINED

DAIRY PRODUCTS TO BE EXAMINED

In this article I am going to talk about absolutely everything regarding dairy. Myths, lactose intolerance, cancer, nutritional aspects, milk processing, cattle conditions, food for muscle growth, what milk is made of ... come on, EVERYTHING. Go for it.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

*ARE WE THE ONLY ONE WHO
*DRINKS OTHER ANIMAL MILK?*LACTOSE INTOLERANCE
*MILK AND NUTRITION
*DAIRY AND OSTEOPOROSIS
*DAIRY AND WEIGHT CONTROL
*DAIRY AND CARDIOVASCULAR *DISEASES
*DAIRY AND DIABETE 
*DAIRY AND CANCER
*MUSCLE GROWTH
*RAW OR TREATED?
*WHAT ARE WE CONSUMING?*CONCLUDING


ARE WE THE ONLY ONE WHO DRINKS OTHER ANIMAL MILK?

We are going to start by commenting on the argument that humans are the only animal that consumes milk from other animals and therefore that is wrong. From the outset that is false.

In the following study we can corroborate this, since the wild cats of the island of Guadeloupe have been seen feeding on the milk of the elephant seals on a regular basis directly from the breasts and also that a good part of their daily energy comes from that milk. .
Why do humans consume more milk than other animals? Well, because to get that milk you have to go to the breasts of an animal that is lactating and extract the milk, which in nature is quite complicated and requires prior domestication of the animals from which the milk is going to be extracted. milk. Which only human beings have done and that is why we can afford more dairy in our diet.

In fact, when animal domestication did not yet exist, dairy was hardly part of our diet, and that is why dairy is often excluded from the Paleo diet since it was introduced in the Neolithic.

The difficulty in obtaining milk from others can also be observed in the study of wild cats, seeing that the milk of the animals that were in the periphery of the herd was consumed, since the females in the center of the group had more status and responded aggressively to those behaviors.

Besides, the human being is the only animal that does many things, such as driving, cooking food, watching TV or doing Sudoku puzzles. Being the only one doing something does not make that something bad by default. Besides, we consume everything from a cow (meat and organs) but is the milk off limits?
In my opinion this argument carries very little weight.

Another argument that I hear very often is that milk is not necessary, so it should not be consumed. In the end, this does not have too much weight since if we have to make and eat only what is necessary for survival and remove from the menu everything that is not strictly necessary ... we will be left with very little on the plate.

Finally, I would like to give a warning to all those who defend to the death that the consumption of milk and derivatives is a crime against health, but who consume Whey protein shakes daily , which are nothing other than dairy derivatives. A little serious gentlemen.

LACTOSE INTOLERANCE

A large part of the population is lactose intolerant. This is a fact.
To be more precise, only 35% of human beings can digest it after 7 years.
Lactose is milk sugar, which is a disaccharide made up of a molecule of glucose and another of galactose. An enzyme called lactase is produced in the small intestine, which allows lactose to break down into its two components and to be able to absorb them.

Humans are well equipped to be able to digest lactose when breastfeeding, as breast milk has more lactose than milk from other animals (6.9 grams in humans and 4.6 in cows, for example) . However, as we grow older, we largely lose the ability to process lactose.

However, there are several studies that show that since the agricultural revolution in the Middle East (it is known that goats began to be domesticated in Iran around 10,000 BC), lactose-reduced dairy derivatives were created that could be included in diet and that, several genetic mutations later and several generations later, lactase could be produced throughout adulthood.

These first ancestors who could tolerate lactose migrated throughout Europe, and that explains why there are many European countries, especially Nordic countries, that tolerate dairy very well, while in Africa, Asia and South America there is a lot of intolerance to lactose and dairy they are hardly part of their diet.

dairy products

The argument that milk feels bad is usually made by people who have lactose intolerance. Normal thing, on the other hand. But you cannot extrapolate a personal condition to a general public. It can be said without any qualms that the vast majority of people do not tolerate a high amount of dairy, but nothing else.

Personally, milk feels great to me, and I don't extrapolate it to everyone by saying that milk is "milk," worth the redundancy.

MILK AND NUTRITION

The next point to address is whether milk is a nutritious food or not. Objectively speaking, there is not much debate. Milk is very nutritious.
For each glass of milk we have the following:

  • Calcium:  276mg 28% of the RDA.
  • Vitamin D:  24% of the RDA
  • Riboflavin (B2):  26% of the RDA
  • Vitamin B12:  18% of the RDA
  • Potassium:  10% of the RDA
  • Phosphorus:  22% of the RDA
  • It also contains significant amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, B6, Selenium, Zinc, and Magnesium.
  • 8 grams of high-quality protein
  • 8 grams of fat , of which 70% are saturated, 25% are monounsaturated and 2-3% are polyunsaturated.
  • 146 calories

DAIRY AND OSTEOPOROSIS

Many people say that dairy causes osteoporosis because evidence has emerged that countries that consume the most dairy have the highest rates of osteoporosis. However, it must be taken into account that osteoporosis is a multifactorial disease and that the evidence proposed is observational.

Countries that have high rates of osteoporosis are also deficient in other things important for bone health, such as vitamin D, physical exercise, vitamin K, etc ...
In fact it is the opposite, there is a fairly high amount of evidence that relates dairy products with better bone health ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ). And the reality is that almost all experimental studies find a positive association between dairy and bone health.

However, I am not going to go as far as saying that dairy is essential for good bone health, because it would be a blatant lie. Although calcium is better absorbed from sources such as dairy (between 30-33%) than from vegetables, there are some vegetable sources such as sesame seeds or almonds, which can provide a significant amount of calcium to the diet and are also absorbed quite well (approximately 20%). Tofu is another option that is high in calcium and has a dairy-like absorption.

Therefore, dairy is not necessary at all from a nutritional point of view. This must be made clear.

DAIRY AND WEIGHT CONTROL

Dairy products are very importantly associated with weight control. Specifically whole dairy.
For this a sample:

  • HUMAN STUDY 1 : Two groups consumed 3.5 servings of whole milk or skim milk respectively. Weight gain was observed in the group that consumed whole milk. Therefore, it is logical to think that  it is not insulin that promotes weight gain, but caloric excess , as we said in the first part of the article.
  • HUMAN STUDY 2 : Low-calorie diets that include dairy do not prevent fat loss.
  • HUMAN STUDY 3 : An increase in dairy consumption does not alter body composition.
  • HUMAN STUDY 4 : Increased consumption of dairy products did not alter body weight or% fat in 135 women for 1 year.
    • 6-month follow-up : Increased dairy predicted a decrease in body fat. 
  • HUMAN STUDY 5 : An increase in dairy did not prevent adequate body control. The high-dairy group showed greater fat oxidation and allowed them to eat more calories without gaining more weight.

We also have several observational studies that corroborate the same thing (  this ,  this ,  this , this  ).

A meta - analysis of 16 observationaltudies reached the same conclusion, only with whole dairy products as mentioned above. Not skim milk.

This probably happens because:

  1. Skim milk is an aberration that continues to make people believe that fats are fattening
  2. They still make believe that "fat free" means healthy
  3. They take away the vitamins naturally present in milk when they are defatted and that they need that lipid fraction to be absorbed (what is called fat-soluble vitamins) and then fortify them with those same vitamins that they have previously taken away and that now do not have the fats to be properly absorbed. Chapó !!

Also within weight control we can talk about the relationship between dairy and diabetes, which also seems to be inverse. The higher the amount of dairy, the lower the incidence of diabetes ( 1 , 2 )

There is one study in particular that I think is worth mentioning regarding diabetes. A 105% increase in basal insulin levels was observed in 8-year-old children after milk consumption. It should be taken into account that the study was carried out in 7 days only, with 12 subjects and in addition the children were given 1.5 liters of milk daily. That's 10 glasses. It is a lot. In addition to the normal diet that they chose.

I would take the results of the study with care.

DAIRY AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Taking advantage of the fact that a meta-analysis has just been published today (January 31, 2016) that observes that dairy consumption may be related to a lower cardiovascular risk, it must be said that it is not the first or the second study to reach these conclusions :

  • Study 1 : 2016 meta-analysis. Inverse relationship between dairy consumption and cardiovascular diseases.
  • Study 2 : 2015 meta-analysis. Same conclusions.
  • Study 3 : Meta-analysis of 2011. Same conclusions.
  • Study 4: 2009 Systematic Review: No relationship is found between dairy products and increased risk of coronary heart disease.
  • Study 5: No increased cardiovascular risk was observed with dairy consumption.
  • Study 6 : 2014 Review. Milk appears to be beneficial for cardiovascular disease.
  • Study 7 : Consumption of fermented milk reduces cardiovascular risk.
  • Study 8 : Dairy can be beneficial for various population groups.
  • Study 9 : The consumption of yogurt and dairy reduces cardiovascular risk.
  • Study 10 : Higher dairy consumption is related to lower cardiovascular risk.
  • Study 11 : Yogurt, cheese, and whole milk appear to protect against cardiovascular disease.
  • Study 12 : Nutritional recommendations for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases: Milk does not appear to be associated with an increased risk.
  • Study 13 : There is no evidence that dairy increases cardiovascular risk in men of any age or in middle-aged women.

DAIRY AND DIABETES

It is very common for dairy to be accused of causing diabetes as well, so scaremongering increases dramatically.

The reality is quite different. Several reviews and meta-analyzes have been made in this regard, and no relationship has been found between dairy consumption and an increase in diabetes. In fact, a relationship has been found, but inverse.

  • 2009 Systematic Review : Inverse Relationship
  • 2010 Revision : Reverse Relationship
  • 2013 Revision : Reverse Relationship

In fact, a very interesting study came out in 2016 that talks about the unique properties of yogurt to prevent type 2 diabetes.

So today we can say that there is not enough evidence to claim that dairy increases the risk of diabetes.

DAIRY AND CANCER

In the 1990s, a hormone called rBGH began to be used in cattle, which is a synthetic version of the bovine somatotropin hormone (BST). The goal was basically to increase milk production.

The problem with this is that the use of rBGH increases the concentration of IGF-1 (Insulin Growth Factor 1) and this has been associated with various cancers, such as prostate, breast or colon.

First of all, it would be necessary to see if IGF-1 can be absorbed when administered orally, since it can be denatured due to the effect of digestion, as happens with the vast majority of nutrients that we ingest.

According to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) this is not the case . IGF-1 is said to break down in the digestion process to have adverse effects in humans.
However, the studies they use to claim that are short-lived, in rats,  and done by the companies that sell rBGH, namely Monsanto and Elanco.

It is also often assumed that IGF-1 will be denatured because other hormones do not support the process, such as insulin. However, there are hormones that support the digestive process and are absorbed intact, such as GnRH.
One 6study found that although IGF-1 administered in isolation did not resist the digestion process, when administered with casein it was 67% absorbed. Although this latest study was in rats as well, it's worth saying.

Human studies have observed that people who consumed 3+ servings of dairy a day had a serum IGF-1 level 10% higher than those who consumed 1.5 servings.
Also it has been observed that children under 8 years who consumed a high amount of milk had higher levels of IGF-1

Assuming milk increases IGF-1 levels in humans, does this translate into a higher incidence of cancer?
Well, there doesn't seem to be much evidence in this regard:

  • BLADDER : There appears to be no link between dairy products and bladder cancer.
  • PROSTATE : A meta-analysis of observational studies from 2008, including 45 studies and more than 26,000 cases, found no relationship. However, a meta - analysis of 32 cohort studies in 2015 found a relationship between excess dairy and prostate cancer. This may be due to overstimulation of the mTORC1 signaling presents cow's milk.
  • GENERAL : There seems to be an inverse relationship.
  • COLORRECTAL : Inverse relationship. The higher the consumption of dairy, the lower the incidence of cancer. The same in 2012
  • BREAST : Consuming dairy, but not milk, was inversely related to breast cancer.

There does not seem to be enough evidence to say that dairy causes cancer today, with the exception of prostate cancer, that there is evidence.

However, and related to the increase in IGF-1, dairy is clearly related to acne ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 )
Therefore, if you are prone to acne, I recommend that you remove dairy of your diet, and if it improves, start reintroducing dairy products such as kefir and see if it is well tolerated.

MUSCLE GROWTH

It is clear that milk and derivatives are a great tool to build muscle mass.

Milk from animals (cow, lamb, sheep) is approximately 80% casein, which is slow-release protein, and 20% whey protein, which is quick-release. Unlike breast milk, which is 60% whey and 40% casein.

This makes milk especially good for building muscle mass as it has an interesting mix of fast and slow absorbing proteins. Apart from having, as we mentioned before, IGF-1, which is a growth factor that obviously affects muscle tissue.

Despite that, a note should be made about caseins . Broadly speaking, we can differentiate two types of caseins that are the most important:

  • Alpha-caseins
  • Beta-caseins.

Among the alpha-caseins there is S1, which is the majority in cow's milk and the one with the most antigenic power (which causes allergies). On the contrary, mother's milk, sheep and goat have the alpha-casein S2 in a higher proportion, which is not usually so problematic.

And within the beta-caseins we have A1 and A2 . Cow's milk has mostly A1, which when consumed a casomorphin called BCM-7 is created after digestion and is linked to heart disease, autism, acne again, etc ... ( 1 , 2 , 3 )

Breast milk, sheep, goat milk, and some cows that must be duly indicated on the packaging, have the A2 variant, so it may be interesting to consume sheep and / or goat milk, since their casein profile is very high. less troublesome.

RAW OR TREATED?

Many people swear and perjure on raw milk since pasteurized milk is said to lose properties and well, there is the idea that "little treated = good", "treated = bad".

It is not the case.

The milk pasteurization process (which is done at 72Āŗ for 15 seconds if it is HTST or 138Āŗ for 2 seconds if it is UHT) does not seem to greatly affect the nutritional characteristics of the milk, neither at the level of proteins, fats nor vitamins / minerals.

And what it does do is eliminate all pathogenic organisms such as   6, which can cause mild gastroenteritis to death.

In fact, in the United States it can be observed that the states in which it is legal to sell raw milk there are many more outbreaks associated with its consumption.

raw milk sprouts 540

We are not going to get dramatic either. You are much more likely to get a fish infection (29 times more likely) so you don't have to demonize raw milk either. However, the hypothetical benefits do not outweigh the potential problems, at least from my point of view.

If you are interested in the subject, I recommend that you read the following article from which I have taken the graphic. Worth it.

WHAT ARE WE CONSUMING?

I couldn't stop talking about the consequences of our milk consumption. Although it does not seem that dairy consumption is harmful within moderation for humans, we have to understand that for us to have milk 24/7 we have to have pregnant cows 24/7.

That means:

  1. Cows must be inseminated so that they are always lactating.
  2. The young are removed as soon as they are born.
  3. Cows are connected to machines that suck their breasts almost daily, so infections, mastitis, and other diseases are quite common.
  4. For this, antibiotic treatments must be applied often, which can be passed into the milk that we later ingest.
  5. To increase milk production, hormones are injected for that purpose, such as rBGH that I mentioned in the cancer section.
  6. The cows are usually in very improvable condition, confined in narrow cages, connected to cables and fed cheap feed.
  7. The Food and Drug Administration states that the somatic cell count cannot exceed 400,000 per milliliter. That's the epithelial cells and leukocytes (come on, pus)

It is clear that reality is not usually as gloomy and savage as organizations like PETA paint it, but it is not usually excessively beautiful either. The reality is what it is and consuming milk and derivatives implies what it implies.

That said, I would like to add that dairy from grass-fed cattle has a much more complete nutritional profile, so it is a good idea to go for these products ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 )

CONCLUDING

Broadly speaking, dairy is a suitable inclusion in my opinion for a balanced diet. However, there is too much obsession with them and it seems that they are more necessary than they really are. In fact, they are completely expendable (like so many other things) and a high percentage of people don't tolerate them, so that's good news for them.

There also does not appear to be a relationship between cancer and dairy, although more research is needed and future studies will probably give us a much more categorical answer on the matter and increase our knowledge of the matter.

In my opinion, dairy has the biggest problem in the ethical aspect, and it can be solved to a large extent by buying quality milk.
Besides, it seems to be a great ally for those looking to gain muscle mass, and consumed in moderation can be beneficial.

Sunday, June 27, 2021

THE KETOGENIC DIET

THE KETOGENIC DIET

The ketogenic diet is gaining a lot of strength and relevance in recent years. However, as with anything that gains a certain fame, people start to appear who want to profit from it, advertising it as something that it is not or with benefits that it does not have. In this article I will explain in the most objective way possible what the ketogenic diet is, what it is for, what it is not for, what benefits it has and how it has been unnecessarily exaggerated.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
WHAT IS THE KETOGENIC DIET?USE OF ENERGY SUBSTRATESWHAT ARE KETONIC BODIES?BENEFITS OF KETOSISPROBLEMS WITH THE KETOGENIC DIETCONCLUSIONS

WHAT IS THE KETOGENIC DIET?

The ketogenic diet is a type of diet in which carbohydrates are significantly restricted in order to stop glucose from being the main energy substrate and move on to fats and ketone bodies. That is, entering a state called ketosis. For most people reducing carbohydrates to less than 100 grams per day will be enough to get into ketosis, however many ketogenic diet purists recommend cutting them down to 50 grams daily.

A couple of things need to be made clear:

  1. The ketogenic diet is not a high-fat, high-protein, low-carb diet. It is a diet low in carbohydrates, high in fat and MODERATE in protein.
  2. Many people are afraid of the ketogenic diet because they confuse ketosis with ketoacidosis. In fact, even google confuses it. If you search for "ketosis" you get the following as the recommended search:

The reality is that ketosis is a metabolic state that the body is adapted to being, while ketoacidosis is a state in which excess ketone bodies creates systemic acidity that is very dangerous to health. But that happens when there is no insulin (in diabetics for example) so it is not something that happens in healthy people. Therefore, it is important to differentiate ketosis from ketoacidosis.

In normal people in ketosis, the production of ketone bodies can be between 120-180 grams / day and the concentration of ketones 4-10 nmol / dL, while in ketoacidosis we have a production of more than 400 grams of ketone bodies per day, at a concentration of more than 20 nmol / dL.

USE OF ENERGY SUBSTRATES

The body is able to use 4 substrates to obtain energy. Glucose, fatty acids, amino acids and ketone bodies.
And these are stored in different amounts in the body, being the fatty acids those that are stored in greater quantity, mainly in the adipose tissue. Keep in mind that a person with 20% body fat can accumulate more than 150,000 kcal in the form of triglycerides.
Next we would have amino acids and glucose. The latter is stored in the liver and muscles in the form of glycogen. The liver can store about 100-150 grams and in the muscle it will depend on the amount of muscle mass that you have, but between 500-800 grams is normal.

At rest the body tends to use a mixture of fatty acids and glucose for energy, although fatty acids are predominantly used. However, the more intensity there is in the activity we are doing, the greater percentage of that energy will come from hydrates and less from fatty acids, as we can see in the following graph:

The body, under special circumstances, can also transform amino acids or glycerol from triglycerides into glucose in the liver through gluconeogenesis to obtain energy, although it is not a route that it usually uses unless it is very low in energy and glucose. So we will not say that it is a priority metabolic pathway under normal conditions. We have to understand that the body will use the most abundant energy substrate as a priority. If the body has enough glucose, it will use this as its main substrate, while if it is scarce it will change and use fatty acids as its main energy source.

And now let's talk about ketone bodies. Although there are many tissues and organs that work with glucose and fatty acids, there are others that cannot use fatty acids for energy. The main one, the brain. The fact that the brain cannot use fatty acids has led to the belief that it can only use glucose, hence the myth that the brain needs sugar to function.

Clearly a misconception, because sugar is a disaccharide made up of a fructose molecule and a glucose molecule, and the brain, if it needs anything, is glucose. So the brain does not need sugar. And also, the brain can use ketone bodies as an energy substrate when glucose is low.

WHAT ARE KETONIC BODIES?

Ketone bodies are compounds that are produced mainly in the mitochondrial matrix of the mitochondria of the liver (and of the kidney to a lesser extent) and are derived from fatty acids, although they can also be obtained from certain amino acids but in very minimal amounts.

We mainly have 3 ketone bodies:

  • Acetoacetic acid or acetoacetate
  • Betahydroxybutyric acid or β-hydroxybutyrate
  • Acetone

These compounds will serve to obtain energy mainly for the brain, which under conditions of glucose shortage can use ketone bodies to cover up to 75% of its energy requirements.

BENEFITS OF KETOSIS

There are many potential benefits to going through periods of ketosis, but we will detail the most important ones and the ones for which there is more evidence.

WEIGHTLOSS

This is a debatable benefit and it has several nuances. Many people have decided to go on a very low carbohydrate diet as they have fallen into the myth that carbohydrates are fattening and that it is impossible to lose body fat by following a high carbohydrate diet. As I have already said, this is a myth, which I have already disproved in many other entries on this blog that I recommend that you read so that you get rid of fears and misinformation.

However, while carbs aren't Public Enemy No. 1, there is some merit to a ketogenic diet for weight loss. Mainly for 3 reasons.

REASON 1

The first reason is that a ketogenic diet is generally higher in protein than a diet based on foods rich in carbohydrates. This is one of the main reasons why short and medium-term studies have shown that a diet high in fat and low in carbohydrates tends to have better results when it comes to losing fat, because proteins increase in these groups ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ). However, when balancing amounts of protein and calories these advantages generally disappear ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ).

Let's take a clear example of the issue that I am trying to explain: In the following  study  , 4 groups were observed that had different dietary approaches. All 4 were on a diet with a 33% caloric deficit and all participants (n = 132) had a BMI of approximately 37. They were all overweight.

  • GROUP 1 : Normal proteins / normal CH
  • GROUP 2 : Normal proteins / low CH
  • GROUP 3 : High proteins / normal CH
  • GROUP 4 : High protein / low CH

RESULTS : At 3 and 12 months, weight loss was greater in the groups with high protein, regardless of the amount of CH that they accompanied.
In addition, all health markers improved equally in the 4 groups, except for diastolic pressure, which improved more in the high protein, high CH group.

What this study lets us see is what has been suspected for some time. What is really important in terms of weight loss is the caloric deficit and the protein ratio mainly. The key macronutrient is protein, not CH. Therefore, increasing protein in a phase of definition or weight loss seems to be the best strategy, whatever diet you follow.

Speaking of ketogenic diets, in 2016 Hall et al. conducted a study comparing a ketogenic diet with an isocaloric diet that was higher in carbohydrates in obese people and were able to observe that not only was there no greater loss of fat in the ketogenic diet, but there was also a small advantage over the other diet.

Regarding protein: How much should be consumed in a definition period? Here you have the answer.

REASON 2

Improve short-term results. That is, another reason why the ketogenic diet is so popular is because in the short term those who follow it lose a very significant amount of weight. I repeat, they lose a significant amount of WEIGHT.

And it is that when glycogen stores are depleted it is very easy to lose weight since glycogen carries a lot of water (each gram of it can drag 3-4 grams of water), so it is not uncommon to lose 2-3 kg of weight in the first few days of following a ketogenic diet. This is good and bad.

That is, it is good as it can increase the initial motivation to follow the plan. It is bad in the sense that many people believe that this is fat and then as the weight loss stabilizes they can be discouraged by not keeping up with that rate. The reality is that this happens when people have unrealistic expectations when it comes to fat loss. At the end of the day, and what was observed in this 2017 study , is that the best diet is the one that creates greater adherence to the individual.

And let's not forget that a ketogenic diet is a restrictive diet in and of itself, so it's fair to say that the more restrictive a diet is, the less adherence it has overall. You have to consider this.

REASON 3

Ketogenic diets seem to have their greatest strength in your satiety.
A systematic review from 2015 appears to reach those conclusions. Ketone bodies seem to dramatically increase satiety in many cases (let's not forget that you have to individualize, I have had cases of people who were doing a ketogenic diet and gained weight) so it can be a very useful tool for certain phases or periods.

LIPIDIC PROFILE

There is a lot of evidence that a well thought out ketogenic diet improves many health parameters.
For example, in 2013 a meta-analysis  came out that concluded that a ketogenic diet improved triglycerides, blood pressure, and HDL than a high-carbohydrate diet for obese people. It must also be said that LDL increased, however the increase in LDL is total, while the particle size increased and the total LDL was divided into fewer particles of larger size each (or what is the same, LDL-P decreased) so the cardiovascular risk was reduced. If you want to know more about total LDL and LDL-P you have the following article .

We also have another study  from 2003 that looked at the effect of a ketogenic diet in 83 obese patients for 24 weeks. The results were quite good, as total cholesterol was lowered, HDL increased, LDL lowered, triglycerides lowered, and glucose level lowered.

However, a very important factor must be taken into account. These studies are done in obese people who have lost weight. This fact by itself will already make all these parameters drastically improve. Obesity is directly related to an increase in cardiovascular risk, and that these parameters are altered. Therefore, while it is a valid tool, simply losing weight and losing body fat using the protocol that creates the most adherence is likely to have similar benefits. We can debate whether more or less, but the priority is to reduce the% fat as effectively as possible, which may or may not be a ketogenic diet.

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES

There is a growing line of research that observes that the ketogenic diet is more than effective in treating epileptic problems, and there are more than enough studies that demonstrate its effectiveness .

In the second link, which is a review, they also come to the conclusion that I told you before, that the ketogenic diet (especially in children) is difficult to follow and that the drops in studies are largely due to the dislike of the diet and gastrointestinal problems thereof, which must be taken into account when proposing a nutritional protocol of these characteristics.

There also appears to be an interesting benefit of the ketogenic diet in neurodegenerative diseases such as Azlheimer or Parkinson's .

METABOLIC FLEXIBILITY

One of the great benefits of the diet is that it increases our metabolic flexibility.
What is metabolic flexibility? Well, explained in the simplest way possible is the body's ability to change its energy substrate in the most optimal way in order to obtain energy.

That is, before we have talked about that depending on the intensity of the exercise the body will need more energy that comes from carbohydrates. The problem is that many people due to their lifestyle, diet excessively high in carbohydrates, sugar and refined flours, sedentary lifestyle, high body fat, etc ... have zero metabolic flexibility, so their metabolism is excessively dependent on glucose. That is, they need glucose significantly from very low intensities. Even athletes of moderate intensity also have this problem, that they are very dependent on glucose.

We have also seen before that the body has a very limited amount of energy stored in the form of glycogen, and yet it has a lot of energy stored in adipose tissue. However, these people cannot access that energy because they depend so much on glucose that they need to continually replenish that small energy tank.

On the other hand, what a person with good metabolic flexibility will do is raise the aerobic threshold, or intensity threshold in which the body needs glucose for energy as a priority, so that it will have a "glycogen sparing" metabolism for Put it in some way, and you will focus on getting your energy primarily from fat stores. That is what they are for, by the way. That is, we have tens of thousands of calories stored that should serve to give us energy and we are all the time depending on glycogen for everything. It doesn't make much sense evolutionarily speaking.

That is, in efforts or intensities that previously used almost only glucose to obtain energy, with a good metabolic flexibility they will now use much more% of fat to obtain it, saving the glycogen that we remember that can objectively give less energy, and that therefore it makes all the sense in the world to save it for when it is really needed. It has been seen that it is possible to go from burning 95% carbohydrates and 5% fat to 60% of VO2 max to spending, at the same intensity, 22% glycogen and 78% fat. Imagine the difference.

PROBLEMS WITH THE KETOGENIC DIET

SPORTS PERFORMANCE

Here we will include both muscle mass gain and sports performance.

Regarding the gain of muscle mass, we find several problems. The first is that it is well established that the optimal gain in muscle mass is found with diets that have a medium percentage of carbohydrates, apart from being high in protein, obviously. At least 3 grams / kg of carbohydrates are generally required to maximize muscle mass gain and to be able to train at high intensities.

Remember what we have said before, the greater the intensity of the exercise, the greater the body's need to use carbohydrates for energy. Therefore, it makes sense that if we are focused on gaining muscle mass and doing high intensity workouts, carbohydrates are an important requirement to maximize results. However, that should not lead us to believe that to gain muscle mass we must consume 60% carbohydrates or we are doing things wrong (as many people believe). In this article I already explained the real carbohydrate needs in terms of gaining muscle mass. They are not as high as many believe, but they are necessary.

It is also interesting to mention that a diet that is too low in carbohydrates will reduce T3 levels, which will reduce protein synthesis. And there are also other potential negative effects why an excessively low carbohydrate diet is not the best for gaining muscle mass:

  1. The cortisol / testosterone ratio   varies. That means there is  more cortisol and less testosterone . Went just the opposite.
  2. Protein degradation increases and  synthesis decreases.
  3. Exercise intensity  decreases  with low CH
  4. Low glycogen levels  interfere with muscle growth

Finally, and regarding the gain of muscle mass, we must remember as we have seen previously that a ketogenic diet is generally very satiating, so it can be difficult to consume all the necessary calories if we are following a protocol that leaves us extremely satiated.

Regarding sports performance we have an extensive  review  that observes the following:

With studies at an intensity of 60-80% of VO2 it was shown that low-carb diets did not give any benefit in performance or a decrease in it after the period of adaptation to low CH. When the performance was measured at high intensities (+ 80% VO2), the best that could be maintained with respect to high CH. But in most cases it decreased.  In most cases, glycogen storage was diminished, which would explain why sports performance is diminished.

However, this review is from the year 2000 and since then it has rained a lot, and several studies have observed that contrary to what may be believed, in some cases sports performance can improve or at least not be impaired , probably due to flexibility metabolic rate that we have discussed before.

ADAPTATION

One of the main problems when starting a ketogenic diet is adaptation. Remember that we are, so to speak, changing the metabolism and this has very marked effects on many people. The body requires time to start producing the changes that will allow us to use mainly fats and ketone bodies, and in this period is when certain side effects can appear.

The main ones are:

  1. Tiredness and little ability to generate intensity in training
  2. Bad breath
  3. Headaches and headaches
  4. Reduced pumping when training with high repetitions

These effects do not always appear (I, for example, do not experience them) and their duration is variable. There are people who take a week to adapt and others can suffer 3-4 weeks. However, it is always temporary.

GREASE BURNING MACHINE

This more than a problem is an error of interpretation.
Many people believe (and many people say this as a positive effect) that by going on a ketogenic diet they will become a fat burning machine. As if that means that they are going to lose body fat at a forceful marches. This is a misconception, because they are two different things.

Yes, it is true that you are going to become a fat burning machine in the sense that your body will prioritize the use of fat as fuel over glucose. That does not mean that you are going to lose body fat, since the fat that you are burning for fuel mainly comes from the fat that you are consuming. That is, it increases fat burning because it increases its consumption. Yes, it is true that you will lose body fat if you are in a caloric deficit and the ketogenic diet, as we have talked about previously, is satiating, high in protein and is a valid tool to enter that caloric deficit, but do not be fooled by these people who It tells you that you will become fat burning machines by being in ketosis, because if that is not accompanied by a caloric deficit ... it is useless.

ADHERENCE

Finally, I would like to talk about adherence to this type of diet. Let's face it, the ketogenic diet is, by definition, an exclusion diet. I don't think there is much debate about it. It may have its advantages, its disadvantages and its uses, but the reality is that you are excluding an important group of nutrients and that greatly affects adherence. Remember that adherence is essential to achieve results and the most optimal protocol at a theoretical level can become a disastrous protocol at a practical level if you are not able to follow. Hence, in the article on clear priorities, I make it very clear that anything that greatly compromises adherence should be taken as a red flag.

This is not unique to the ketogenic diet. Any excessively restrictive diet has the same problem. The vegan diet, for example, is another diet that, while perfectly viable and healthy, is also a diet that has a high abandonment rate. Precisely because it is a very restrictive diet.

Studies that show that the ketogenic diet is superior to a more varied diet always have several common problems:

  1. They are short term. They usually last 6 months, which at the level of adherence does not help me at all. It's okay to follow a protocol for 6 months, but I want to know if you are able to follow it for years. This is how I value adherence, and in the long term the ketogenic diet has a high abandonment rate, which would indicate that its most appropriate use is as a one-off or periodic tool.
  2. They do not take novelty into account. As these are short-term studies, adherence is often increased simply by doing a different protocol. These studies usually compare "standard" diets or what the patient was following versus the novel diet (in this case, the ketogenic). This means that in the initial stages you usually see some improvement, which eventually fades.
  3. Calories and macronutrients are not balanced. Ketogenic diets tend to be, as I explained above, higher in protein and more satiating, generating more caloric deficits, which is why they tend to increase the results compared to other diets with less protein or higher in calories. Seeing better results tends to motivate, although these results are not equivalent as they are not in the same conditions.

Simply note that, by common sense, an exclusion diet will always have more problems in the long run than one that allows more options. Following a well planned ketogenic diet is a viable option, but if you find that you cannot follow it and that you are failing it, looking for an alternative would be ideal.

CONCLUSIONS

I hope this article has solved the biggest doubts you have about the ketogenic diet and that it has guided you. It is clear that there are many issues that I have not covered regarding it, such as how to structure a good ketogenic diet, mistakes that are made often, what types of ketogenic diet are there and how to implement them in a planning ...

But this will be for another time, I think there is already too much information in the same article.

EAT OUT WHAT DO I DO?

EAT OUT WHAT DO I DO?

One of the most worrying points for those who have decided to change their eating habits and try to improve their nutrition is knowing what to do when they cannot follow the diet and have to eat out. In this article I want to give you some simple and very practical guidelines so that eating out is not a source of anguish and that it begins to be what it should, a quality time with people you appreciate.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
POINTCASE 1 - NO ADVANCE MEAL AT SITE GUARROCASE 2 - EARLY MEAL AT SITE GUARROCASE 3 - MEAL NOT ADVANCE IN THE CORRECT PLACECASE 4 - ADVANCE MEAL IN THE CORRECT PLACESUMMARIZING

POINT

We are going to start with the most basic and I want it to be clear and straightforward.
Everyone knows that eating a salad on Saturday night if the rest of your week has been full of junk food is of no consequence. That is, a diet is not fixed by a salad.

That is clear, but when we put the opposite example it costs much more to understand and many people believe that the world is ending, and it is not true. If your day-to-day is full of quality food (that is, eggs, meats, fish, nuts, greens, vegetables, fruits, legumes, cereals, etc ...) that you eat out on Saturday night will not have a relevant impact on your results in the medium term. Come on, adding the second part of the sentence would look something like this:

A diet is not fixed by a salad, and it is not screwed by a hamburger. It is your overall lifestyle and diet that will impact your results in the medium term.

The only way I'd do it is if you're really in such an out of date state when you're out that you've binged several thousand calories non-stop. This is not normal and is mainly due to two problems:

  • Some much deeper psychological problem, for which I have no tools to fix it in this blog and that you should deal with a professional who can really help you.
  • You have a shitty diet, too restrictive in both calories and food options So when you get to this event, which shouldn't mean anything serious, you are so hungry and so many cravings that you literally cannot stop eating and you cannot exercise the slightest control. To do this, stop doing this "diet" and start thinking about a restructuring to feed with feet and head should become the number 1 priority.

Leaving these two cases aside, we are going to talk about the vast majority of people who are not included in the groups mentioned above. Those who have a more or less correct diet and those who can keep a check.

That said, we will differentiate several situations in which we can find ourselves and I will give you specific and very simple recommendations for each of the cases.

CASE 1 - NO ADVANCE MEAL AT SITE GUARRO

In this case we have an impromptu meal (when leaving work, you decide to go out to dinner at the time) and the group wants to dine in a place that you know there will be no healthy option. See fast food chain pizzeria, kebab or something similar.

This is the trickiest case, because I would recommend (mainly for psychological health) that you dismiss these options that surely have crossed your mind:

  1. Not to go. Let's see, if this going out to very dirty places is recurrent, it may be the case that you decide that this group of friends is not the most appropriate to go out to eat frequently. But if it is a sporadic case, I would not recommend leaving.
  2. Order food in a separate place and go to the restaurant. I think it is a nuisance both for you and for others, apart from that it is likely that they will not let you in with food from other establishments.
  3. Go but don't eat. Well, you are going to be the weirdo who is going to watch while everyone eats. The noises in your stomach and the drool from your mouth are probably not to the liking of other diners. Have the courtesy to let them know.

This is the case in which the previous sentence becomes more relevant. Don't worry, it won't affect your results in the medium term. Really not. Eat and calm down. You know that you eat well every day, that your diet is adequate and that tomorrow you will be "on track" again. Enjoy, have a good time and that's it.

Of course, for fans of self-sabotage I ask you please the next day DO NOT PESISE.
Why? Well, because obviously you will weigh more (you have eaten more, you have more food in your digestive system, maybe you have retained some water, ...) and if you weigh yourself in these circumstances you are going to take a bad drink.

And the fucking thing is that many weigh themselves in these circumstances knowing in advance that the weight is not going to please them, but they do it anyway to gloat in their misery. Hey, yesterday you ate more than you normally eat, that's it. Turning the page. Do not weigh yourself, do not confirm it if you are not going to be calm with the result. Point. Make your life easier.

CASE 2 - EARLY MEAL AT SITE GUARRO

In this second case we eat again in a dirty place but this time we have some room for maneuver because we already knew it beforehand. Several points above apply:

  • If this is something very recurring, maybe you should not hang out with these people so much.
  • I do not recommend not going, or not eating, or taking food from outside or tupperware.

That said, as we have had a reasonable amount of time to prepare, we can make some alterations prior to this event to minimize the impact of this meal. Among others we have the following:

  1. Go training that day. Psychologically, the fact of having done an intense training prior to eating a less recommended meal always relaxes. If you are going to go to a place where you know that the food is very caloric… add more training volume. Without fear. Add some series here and there and let yourself be in the living room. The extra caloric afterwards will help in your recovery.
  2. Reduce the food that day. We mainly talk about fat as fast food chains are famous for having extremely greasy meals. Today everyone is freaking out on carbs, but there really are a lot of fast food dishes and ultra-processed products that have a lot more calories from fat than carbs. Take for example McDonald's Sweet BBQ Bacon.We have 40 grams of fat that give a total of 360 kcal (almost half of the entire hamburger) while we have 62 grams of carbohydrates, or what is equivalent to 248 kcal. Let's not forget that fat is also extremely palatable, that it has more than twice the calories of carbohydrates and that it is very easy to reach a caloric surplus with a diet very high in fat if they are from ultra-processed products. So in my opinion, if you are going to restrict something, it should be fat mainly that day.
  3. Practice intermittent fasting . If you go to a dinner, fasting 16/8 or LeanGains is your best ally.
  4. Obviously, everything that you can save better than better. That is, you can ask for water instead of putting 1 liter of Coca-Cola between chest and back. You can order CocaCola Zero and you avoid putting those almost 90 grams of sugar in your body. You know, viable options.
  5. Probably if you have eaten a lot in this place the next day you will wake up still satiated and / or full. It is normal and has to do with leptin levels . In simple terms, our body does not want to be in caloric surplus for a long time, so if one day you give it a very large excess, the levels of leptin will increase accordingly and will reduce your hunger. It is a way of saying "yesterday you went over, today you control yourself."

Be very careful about compensating for the day's food to "square" a dirty meal. This is a double-edged sword, because we can get to do the kaffir with the excuse of compensating the diet and end up worsening the results.

That is to say, it is not uncommon to see cases kicked in by people who believe that as they "consume a multivitamin" they have a free way to eat worse since the micronutrients are already obtained through the supplement.
It is not uncommon to see people who "like to put on sunscreen" come to justify spending almost three months a year taking 6 hours a day in the sun until they are scorched.
And it is not uncommon to see people who like to compensate their diet to include less recommended products end up consuming much more of these than if they had not compensated in the first place….
If you are clear that this is a sporadic measure, go ahead. If you use it to eat worse, we are going wrong and you have not understood the message.

CASE 3 - MEAL NOT ADVANCE IN THE CORRECT PLACE

By correct site I do not mean a site that you have to mortgage to order an appetizer. I mean a restaurant that has a wider selection of dishes, such as salads, meat, fish, etc ... In this case there should be no problem.

You have enough options to make a less healthy meal within the possibilities of that restaurant. Let's see several points that you can apply:

  • If you make finger food, look for light and easily digestible alternatives and share with others.
  • You can start with a salad first, which will most likely satisfy you a lot while controlling the calories as much as possible.
  • As a second course you have the option of choosing something that you do not consume frequently. That is, you can choose fish if you do not usually add them to your diet, so you will take the opportunity to include something nutritious that day that you do not usually eat.
  • You always have alternatives and there are small changes to make. If you want to control the maximum, for example, you can change the accompaniment for salad, or if they put French fries you can always choose baked potatoes. Be creative.
  • There is always room for dessert. But you can split it with someone, so that you keep the good taste in your mouth but you have not eaten so much, better than better. Sometimes we see life in black and white and our thinking is "or not like NOTHING, or I get up to my ass and lost to the river." There is an immense gamma of gray between those two points of view, and I think that's where the balance lies.
  • It has also been seen in studies that the order in which we consume food can alter our appetite. That is, if we focus on vegetables first, then a source of lean protein or more fat and then add carbohydrates, we will probably be more satiated, so we will consume less at the end of the meal.

CASE 4 - ADVANCE MEAL IN THE CORRECT PLACE

Little more to add to this case. It is the simplest of the four scenarios. We know in advance that we have this event with which we can take measures accordingly, either reducing calories on the same day or the next, we can train, we can reduce carbohydrates, we can fast, etc ...

We also go to a site that has a wider selection of dishes, so we can take the above advice as valid and applicable. So ... nothing more to add.

SUMMARIZING

Thinking of nutrition as something black or white is the prelude to many problems, such as obsession, orthorexia, eating disorders, bad relationships with food, etc ...

You must understand that life has to have a degree of flexibility and that you must allow yourself not to do everything 100% at any time without negatively impacting your results or your head. Give yourself the freedom to not always be perfect and understand that if you lead a proper lifestyle and a healthy diet for just one day doing the wrong or "not perfect" things, it will not significantly alter your results at all.

Hope it has fit.

Saturday, June 26, 2021

High fiber food

Increasing the consumption of foods rich in fiber reduces the risk of hypertension and type 2 diabetes

Increasing the consumption of foods rich in fiber reduces the risk of hypertension and type 2 diabetes

       We have all heard about the importance of dietary fiber as an essential part of a healthy diet for its various health benefits. Fiber is a complex of carbohydrates found in plant-based foods that is sometimes referred to as "forage." Its main characteristic is that they cannot be digested in the small intestine, while the other carbohydrates, sugars and starches, are digestible and decomposed into glucose that is used for energy.

Numerous studies have shown that high fiber diets often result in a healthier weight, which in itself is already a protective factor against chronic diseases that can help reduce the risk of many cardiometabolic diseases such as obesity, resistance insulin and cardiovascular disease. In some cases, it also reduces the chance of getting colorectal cancer. Increased fiber intake has also been associated with lower cholesterol levels.

Fiber was originally thought to stick to bad cholesterol in the intestines before it could be absorbed into the bloodstream, and by stimulating peristaltic movement, it helps eliminate harmful fats and even sugars. Now it has been discovered that fiber actually serves as a substrate or food for our healthy intestinal bacteria, the microbiome, who can digest it into useful fragments called short chain fatty acids (SCFA), which in addition to being a way to recover energy , are those that benefit health by improving lipid metabolism, reducing cholesterol, helping control blood sugar and reducing inflammation. Dietary fiber is considered prebiotic. Apart from SCFAs, hydrogen, carbon dioxide and methane are produced.

Foods rich in fiber are whole grains and derivatives such as bread, oats, rice, wheat, rye, bran and pasta; legumes such as beans, peas, beans and lentils, all fruits and vegetables: mango, pineapple, apple, pear, grape, spinach, broccoli, cauliflower, etc., and vegetables such as cassava, celery, and tomato.

There are two types of dietary fiber, and most plant foods contain some of each type:

  • Soluble fiber dissolves in water to form a thick gel-like substance in the stomach. It is broken down by bacteria in the large intestine and provides some calories.
  • Insoluble fiber does not dissolve in water and passes through the gastrointestinal tract relatively intact and is therefore not a source of calories.

Soluble fiber is found in a variety of foods, including:

  • Beans and peas
  • Fruit
  • Oats (such as oat bran and oats)
  • Nuts and seeds
  • Vegetables

Insoluble fiber is found in a variety of foods, including:

  • Fruits (especially with their skin)
  • Nuts and seeds
  • Vegetables
  • Wheat bran
  • Whole foods (such as brown rice and whole grain breads, cereals, and pasta)

Soluble fiber can interfere with the absorption of fat and cholesterol in the diet. This, in turn, can help lower the levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL or "bad") cholesterol in the blood. Soluble fiber also slows down digestion and the rate at which carbohydrates and other nutrients are absorbed into the bloodstream. This can help control your blood glucose level (often called blood sugar) by preventing rapid rises in blood glucose after a meal.

Insoluble fiber provides "bulk" for stool formation and accelerates the movement of food and waste through the digestive system, which can help prevent constipation.

Both soluble and insoluble fiber make you feel full, which can help you eat less and stay full longer.

Fiber, diabetes 2 and hypertension

According to a study presented at the 2019 American College of Cardiology Middle East Conference, eating high-fiber foods reduces the risk of hypertension and type 2 diabetes, two huge risk factors for heart disease and stroke. Hypertension or high blood pressure can lead to many complications, including cardiovascular disease, heart attacks, kidney disease, and even strokes, while type 2 diabetes can also lead to other complications such as cardiovascular disease, neuropathy, kidney disease, and wasting vision, among others.

The team of researchers from the Care Well Heart and Super Specialty Hospital in India explored the connection between a high fiber diet and cardiovascular risk factors.

According to the guidelines of the National Institute of Nutrition and the Indian Council for Medical Research, the recommended daily allowance (RDA) for dietary fiber is 40g / 2000kcal.

The patients in this study had type 2 diabetes, a calorie intake of 1,200-1,500 kcal, and their daily fiber intake was between 24-30 g. For the study, their fiber intake was increased by as much as 25 percent, bringing it to about 38 grams (this equates to about 1.5 cups of high-fiber cereal).

The study tracked the fiber intake of the 200 participants for six months and included controls at the start of the study, at three months, and at six months. Participants received diet recipes in their regional languages, which included detailed lists of different food groups and serving sizes. Qualified dietitians provided the information through regular counseling sessions and used audiovisual aids to ensure understanding among study participants.

The researchers tracked the participants' fiber intake in a number of ways, including by having patients send photos of their meals via WhatsApp, which not only helped to understand their fiber intake, but also helped to approximate their size. the portions. Telephone calls were made three times a week during which the food consumed was recalled in detail.

For 6 months, the high-fiber diet improved several cardiovascular risk factors:

  • 9 percent reduction in serum cholesterol
  • 23 percent reduction in triglycerides
  • 15 percent reduction in systolic blood pressure
  • 28 percent reduction in fasting blood sugar

Big results

According to this study, eating just 25 percent more than the RDA for fiber was all that was needed to see benefits for this population.

Several scientific commentators have stated that this study helps us determine three things that are important to the patient population studied:

  • First of all, a high fiber diet is important in cases of diabetes and hypertension to prevent future cardiovascular diseases.
  • Second, medical nutrition therapy and regular counseling sessions are also of great importance in the treatment and prevention of diabetes and hypertension.
  • Third, this type of diet in combination with medical treatment can improve dyslipidemia, pulse wave velocity, waist-to-hip ratio, and hypertension.

How to get more fiber in your diet

The easiest way to obtain foods with the highest amount of fiber is by sticking to fruits, vegetables, legumes, and greens as an important part of the daily diet.The skins of fruits and vegetables in particular have most of the fiber present. in them

It is recommended that we should take 25 to 30 grams of fiber per day, however, as the specialists recommend “anything above that must be accompanied by drinking enough water so that the fiber is activated and can move through the system. digestive.

According to the 2015-202nd Dietary Guidelines for the US population, foods with the highest fiber content include:

  • Ready-to-eat cereal with high-fiber bran: 14 grams in ¾ cup
  • White, yellow, black cooked beans: almost 10 grams in 1/2 cup
  • Shredded wheat: 5 grams in 1 cup

Big Bottom Line: Eating fiber can benefit everyone's health, and the best sources are fruits, vegetables, legumes, and greens.

In Venezuela we do not have availability of cereals rich in fiber, nor how to access them, perhaps you can get bran, but we can increase the consumption of fruits, vegetables, legumes and vegetables, which although expensive, seeing them from the perspective of reducing cardiovascular risk , among other benefits they provide, can be better valued by an informed consumer.


Here are some ebooks based on health  and fitness for please click here 

HIGH PROTEIN FOODS

Diets to lose fat NOT recommended

Diets to lose fat NOT recommended We are already in 2020, and the current presence that some fat loss diets continue to have in the world of...